Skip to content

Belarus

    Belarus has an ethnically diverse population with a majority ethnic Belarusian (83.7%), and 16.3% of ethnic minorities, including Russian 8.3%, Polish 3.1%, Ukrainian 1.7%, other 3.2% (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2023). Belarus’ history was intertwined with its more powerful neighbours; the small Slavic republic, the larger ones being Russia and Ukraine, was a member of the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1991. The main challenges to diversity in Belarus relate to language rather than ethnicity due to the promotion of Russian and subsequent marginalisation of the Belarusian language. The Russian language dominated the daily business and education in cities and urban centres while Belarusian was confined to the countryside, creating a division within the society (Smolicz and Secombe 2003).

    Currently, the Belarus constitution guarantees and recognises fundamental rights in the areas of culture, the right to preserve one’s national identity, selection, and usage of language of communication and education. Furthermore, the constitution states that the state has responsibility to preserve and sustain the culture and heritage of all ethnic communities residing in Belarus (UNESCO 2006). However, the emphasis on the state’s role in promoting cultural diversity has been criticised that it limits the financing of cultural programs to align with state politics (ICELDS 2018).

    ComponentScore
    Legislative Dimension0.61
    Multiculturalism0.56
    Anti-Discrimination0.67
    Structural Dimension0.44
    Social Contact0.01
    Fractionalisation0.52
    Inequality0.85
    Access to communication0.31
    Cohesion and Stability0.50
    Opportunities Dimension0.49
    Attitudes0.51
    Inclusion0.52
    Freedoms and Rights0.43
    ICDI Score0.51
    Note: the higher values of the scores the more favourable the results.

    Belarus has attained an overall ICDI score of 0.51 in the current articulation of the ICDI results. A score above 0.8 in the component of inequality signals a high degree of intergenerational social mobility and high levels of educational attainment among the population. A score above 0.6 in the component of anti-discrimination signals the moderate presence of anti-discrimination acts or policies in the country. In contrast, a score of 0.01 in the component of social contact indicates little intercultural participation between different ethnic groups. It also indicates a low number of Indigenous and immigrant living languages.

    Compared to its slightly above average situation relating to its legislative dimension, Belarus achieves a just below average score in its structural and opportunities dimensions. A lower score in its structural dimension can be attributed to a score of 0.31 in the component of access to communication. A below average score in its opportunities dimension can be attributed to average scores across the components of intercultural attitudes, minority representation and freedom and rights. Belarus can improve its ICDI score by strengthening its structural dimension. This can be done by encouraging intercultural participation and increasing the number of communication platforms available to improve the populations’ access to communication.